The complaint seeks an independent investigation into alleged crimes committed by Hasina.
A criminal case has been initiated at the International Criminal Court (ICC) against former Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina, along with 69 associates, alleging their involvement in crimes against humanity during the protests that occurred in July and August of this year.
The complaint, submitted on October 28, calls for an independent investigation into the purported offenses committed by Hasina, her Cabinet members, and various law enforcement agencies.
Md Ashraful Arefin, a British lawyer of Bangladeshi descent and the plaintiff in this case, disclosed information during a press conference held in London on Friday, alongside Barristers Sarah Fore and Emil Lixandru from Bolt Court Chambers.
Arefin accused the Bangladeshi security forces of using live ammunition, rubber bullets, sound grenades, and other deadly weapons against peaceful protesters, and he further alleged that there were instances of bodies being incinerated and interred in mass graves to conceal evidence.
“We have provided substantial evidence, including documents, video footage, and records of the violence and oppression perpetrated by Hasina’s government, to assist the court in bringing charges against her and issuing an international arrest warrant,” Arefin remarked.
This case has been filed under Article 15 of the Rome Statute, which allows the ICC prosecutor to commence investigations based on information provided by individuals.
Political support
Arefin raised concerns regarding the capacity of Bangladesh’s judiciary to conduct an unbiased investigation, pointing to the influence exerted by officials associated with the previous Hasina administration.
He further questioned the feasibility of enforcing any local ruling, considering the potential political backing for Hasina from neighboring India.
Arefin remarked that India might face pressure to align with the international community should an ICC warrant be issued, underscoring the global implications of the case.
In the wake of student-led protests, Hasina’s administration mobilized various security forces, including the police and the elite Rapid Action Battalion, alongside affiliates of the Awami League and its student organization, the Bangladesh Students’ League.
In reaction to the protesters’ demands, the transitional government, which assumed power on August 8, subsequently prohibited the Bangladesh Students’ League, designating it as a terrorist entity.
On October 17, Dhaka’s International Crimes Tribunal issued a domestic arrest warrant for Hasina, who had sought refuge in India on August 5.
